Saturday, February 6, 2016

The Oil-Well-ian Doublespeak Guide to the Marco Rubio Energy Plan


Table of Contents:
1: MOVING FORWARD INTO THE PAST
2: TAKING THE ENERGY OUT OF COMPETITION
3: THE SHOE IS ON THE WRONG FOOT !
4: SHHH…BE CAREFUL HOW YOU TALK ABOUT IT!
5: REGULATION- THE OPPOSITE OF INNOVATION
6: FUN WITH INCONSISTENT DOUBLE NARRATIVES!
7: DOMESTIC POLICY
8: FOREIGN POLICY

MOVING FORWARD INTO THE PAST
·      
  “Forward thinking” = Old-school Orthodox policies that happen to be coming from a young and fresh faced figure.
·       
  “Let innovation flourish” = burning every carbon molecule that can be found, as quickly as possible
·    
   “New” – Rejecting scientific consensus and doubling down US reliance on fossil fuels
·    
   “Outdated” / “Stuck in the past”-  = Plans to invest in solar energy and smart grids 
·       
  “New technology and innovation” = Horizontal drilling
·         
 “Reforming our outdated higher education system”- see “Energy Jobs of the Future”
·        
“Energy jobs of the future” = The shale revolution
·      
  “New American Century” = A hostility to international agreements that the United States will finally have if it is fully taken over by the only conservative political party in the world that denies human-caused climate change is real.  
·       
  “Old American Century” = Republican Presidents who helped strengthen the Montreal Protocol on the ozone layer and helped the EPA create a cap-and-trade system to reduce acid rain causing pollutants.
·       
  “Sweeping energy efficiency measures”- Something that was OK to speak in favor of while in the Florida Legislature between 2006 and 2008, but not OK to mention when vying for Koch Brother donations in a Presidential Primary 

· "Special Tax incentives for renewable energy”- Something that was OK to speak in favor of while in the Florida Legislature between 2006 and 2008, but not OK to mention when vying for Koch Brother donations in a Presidential Primary 

· "Programs for alternative-fuel vehicles” - Something that was OK to speak in favor of while in the Florida Legislature between 2006 and 2008, but not OK to mention when vying for Koch Brother donations in a Presidential Primary 

TAKING THE ENERGY OUT OF COMPETITION
·   
    “Leveling the playing field” = eliminating subsidies for renewable energy while overlooking and ignoring much bigger subsidies to fossil fuels.
·  
   “Innovation” = Shutting down the federal programs that invest in and have helped develop renewable technologies. The antonym of “regulation”
·    
    “Competition” = Freezing the status quo into place
·   
   “Restricting consumer choice” = Any energy plan that helps renewable energy be more accessible and affordable to a greater number of people
·   
   “Private sector- led development of new energy technologies” – Letting the world’s richest people who have the biggest amount of vested interests make the decisions on which energy technologies get deployed instead of well-educated people who mean well and know a lot of stuff.
·   
   “The most promising technologies” = Technologies that are manufactured by whichever company gives candidates the greatest amount of campaign contributions in exchange for promises.
·    
   “Government promoting competition“ -  Government giving more to industries that already have more enabling them to outcompete entrepreneurial start-ups.
·    
   “Government renewing its focus on basic Research” - The only proper role government has for renewable energy so that researchers can reach conclusions we already know about solutions we will refuse to help implement anyway.

·  “Handing out subsidies to favored companies” – Something which that other political party does but that we don’t.
·    
    “Picking winners and losers” – a term not used in reference to politicians who vote against ending subsidies to favored fossil fuel companies that are already profitable. 
·  
    “Providing subsidies to prop up an uncompetitive technology” – Does not refer to an Ohio utility asking $3 billion to bail out old nuclear and coal plants that are no longer cost competitive. Also does not refer to a Georgia utility demanding rate increases pay for a nuclear plant that is not even putting electricity onto the grid.

THE SHOE IS ON THE WRONG FOOT !
·     
    “Frivolous Lawsuits” = Occurs when environmentalists sue federal agencies or corporations for not following rules in hopes of getting new regulations. However is does not apply to when corporations sue environmentalists simply for saying things they don’t want the public to be aware of.
·      
   “Special interest groups” – Those who have an agenda to protecting environment and public health for their own selfish individual gain profiting handsomely from costly new regulations.
·    
     “Exposing True costs” = Something that exists when it refers to litigation on behalf of environment and public health, but something does not exist when it refers to the fossil fuel industry externalizing its costs onto environment and public health.
·    
    “Affordable Energy” = Turning a blind eye to the lost work days caused by coal pollution

SHHH…BE CAREFUL HOW YOU TALK ABOUT IT!
·    
      “Impact on global climate” – a phrase only to be invoked when complaining how the Clean Power Plan will not have a meaningful impact on global climate
·   
       “A Burden that fall heavily on seniors, minorities, and working poor” = A phrase only to be used on the campaign trail when trying to imply the Clean Power Plan will cause electricity rates to skyrocket
·    
     ”Regulations to reduce carbon emissions” = A group of policy proposals to denounce very forcefully while never making a case why reducing carbon emissions is pointless as if there is no reason or explanation the carbon regulations exist in the first place.
·   
     “Renewable Energy/ Clean Energy Jobs” = something that can’t be acknowledged directly in campaign messages due to its sky high popularity even among Conservatives
·      
   “Climate Change / Carbon Pollution” = Something that either does not happen or is not even worth mentioning

     “Weather” = Something to continually conflate with climate so as to directly give the climate deniers a pretense of legitimacy. Hence any moves to tackle climate change are simply misguided attempts at "changing the weather."
·        
“"All of the above energy plan” = Something that candidates are required to occasionally make notional gestures toward because it is more politically savvy than mindless iterations of “drill baby drill”.

REGULATION- THE OPPOSITE OF INNOVATION
·       
  “Limiting the Power of Unelected Regulators” = A plan to staff government departments like the EPA with people that work for the same industries they are supposed to be regulating
·    
     “Federal bureaucracy” = A term used to express annoyance that protected areas are actually protected
·     
    “Obama’s carbon mandates” = An illegal scheme from on-the-books Clean Air Act legislation that allows each state the flexibility to determine how it will meet its share of CO2 emissions reduction goals.
·   
      “Cutting red tape” = Could refer to speeding up the permitting process for oil and gas pipelines or any additional review process from any government department as long as the exact red tape referred to is unspecified

FUN WITH INCONSISTENT DOUBLE NARRATIVES!
·    
    “Energy Revolution” = Lauding the miracles of exploding domestic fossil fuel extraction while in the same breath lamenting onerous government regulations that have simultaneously quashed it… all while ignoring a more rapid than anyone expected global rise in renewable energy

·     ”Obama administration” – A cabal whose job-killing environmental regulations have been strangling the energy industry during the same time period which a boom of new cheap oil and gas has revitalized American manufacturing and led to well over a million jobs.

·     “Washington’s vast regulatory bureaucracy” = An entity that has suffocated the energy industry with costly regulation at the same time the energy industry has triumphantly developed brilliant new hydraulic fracturing innovations that happen to be exempt from the Clean Water Act thus out of reach from federal regulators.

·     “Washington’s Crusade to stifle American Energy Production” = Refers to the last 7 years when Roughneck oil drillers turned the Bakken shale formation into the new wild west which the Federal government did not delay.

·     ”Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama”- Political standard bearers to baselessly accuse of opposing hydraulic fracturing technology and being radical environmentalists no matter how strongly actual environmentalists may wish they had actually made moves to oppose fracking.

DOMESTIC POLICY
·       
   “Keystone XL Pipeline” = Would have strengthened national security and North American energy independence by sending Canadian tar sands straight to ports on the Gulf Coast to be exported.
·     
    “World’s energy superpower” = The United States will no longer the world’s breadbasket because the Ogallala aquifer gets poisoned by the Keystone XL pipeline we must build for national security reasons.
·     
    “Optimizing America’s resources” = Expediting approval for oil & natural gas export infrastructure

·     ”Lost Opportunity” = Subsidizing wind turbines and solar panels in order to triple their use by 2030 at a time when we have $650 billion of oil and gas that are doing no good just being pent up in shale rock.

·      “Acting on climate change” = Something that we should not do because America "it is not a planet"

FOREIGN POLICY
·       
   “Defending US interests in global climate talks” = Offering zero assistance to developing nations to through the green climate fund and saying no to any and every carbon constraint
·       
  “International Cooperation”- Helping our vulnerable European Allies acquire natural gas supplies from the Caspian Sea and Central Asia
·     
    “TTIP/ Trade agreements” = Good, as long as there are no restrictions on US energy exports



The Oil-Well-ian Doublespeak Guide To The Marco Rubio Energy Plan- See